![]() |
|||
Breaking
News Opinions
expressed in Stam-Scandal.com by contributors are not necessarily shared
by |
UPU
hides behind the skirts of Swiss law
We
now have the letter from the UPU regarding their continuing libels about our
source.
In
the letter (see below), the UPU's legal representative, O. Meylan Braachi, categorically
states that the UPU issues circulars based on information supplied by member
countries without checking any of that information; that only the Postal Administrations
of a country can issue postage stamps and that the UPU is protected by Swiss
law from any legal attack as a result of it's actions.
This
letter indicates exactly what sort of never-never land the UPU lives in.
Corruption
Any
corrupt official in a Postal Administration can issue a contract to issue stamps
to a legitimate dealer and then write a letter to the UPU telling them that
there is no contract.
The
UPU will then help him in his fraud by denouncing in their worthless circulars
any stamps issued by the dealer as illegal, without ever finding out whether
a genuine contract exists.
The
dealer, who has paid substantial fees for a contract to issue stamps on behalf
of that Postal Administration, is left with nowhere to turn for legal redress.
If
a Postal Administration can be shown to have issued a contract to a third party
to issue stamps on it's behalf, how can it remain as a member of the UPU?
It
has broken the rules of the Universal Postal Convention and all the stamps issued
by that country should be declared illegal and the countries membership of the
UPU revoked.
Otherwise,
what is the point of the UPU?
Is
it just a cosy club where members can get away with any illegal act without
fear of prosecution?
Scrap
the UPU
The
UPU hides behind the voluminous skirts of the Swiss legal system when they are
asked to justify their ridiculous behaviour in court.
The
Postal Administrations are unassailable in their own courts and do not recognise
the jurisdiction of the courts in the dealer's home country.
In
our opinion, this action makes the UPU accessories to a criminal act - a criminal
act that can never be prosecuted.
This
is the moral and ethical framework in which the UPU operates as they pretend
to uphold the values of the world of philately.
While
they are consorting with their rich friends at parties and conferences, they
ignore the activities of real criminals like Sako Khatchikian and aid and abet
fraudulent activity with their uninformed pronouncements.
In
1978, the UPU officially confirmed that our source was the
official concessionaire for the production of stamps for Equatorial Guinea.
If they are so emphatic that only the Postal Administrations can issue stamps,
why was the Director General of the UPU able to confirm to the Michel Catalogue
- a catalogue with an increasingly tainted reputation - that a third party was
officially sanctioned to produce stamps for a country? Why
have the rules changed?
Stamp
Scandal.com calls for the Kofi Anaan and the United Nations to scrap the UPU
and for an unbiased, accountable organisation to be formed in it's stead; an
organisation that will dedicate itself to the exposure of fraudulent activity
by Postal Administrations and the elimination of actual illegal stamps.
|
||